As a consequence of our work on behalf of persons who have suffered personal injuries, we have had the opportunity to work closely with the British Columbia Paraplegic Association, which provides services to individuals who have sustained spinal cord injuries. The lawyers of Steele Urquhart have supported the efforts the BCPA for almost 30 years. In 2008, we were proud to sponsor the BCPA’s weeklong workshop for counsellors from throughout the Province, which was held in Vancouver.
We have obtained an award of punitive damages of $75,000 against a major international bank and a bailiff for the wrongful seizure of the assets of an automobile repair business. The award was in addition to compensation awarded for the actual damage suffered by the business and was largely predicated on the bank’s and bailiff’s failure to return the property promptly once they had learned that the had improperly seized the property.
We have successfully represented individuals who have been injured and the families of individuals who have been killed in airplane crashes in British Columbia. In one instance, the case had been brought by American lawyers in Washington State in an attempt to avoid the application of British Columbia’s workers compensation laws that would have prevented the recover of any compensation. After the Washington Court dismissed the case, Steele Urquhart was successful in obtaining a ruling that the workers compensation law of British Columbia did not apply. Although the time for commencing a lawsuit in British Columbia had expired by the time Steele Urquhart was brought into the case, we were able to obtain a settlement on the basis that the limitation period had been extended.
We have successfully represented individuals in proceedings to recover disability payments that have been wrongfully denied to them by their own insurance companies. Many of these cases involve arbitrary decisions made by claims examiners based on inaccurate and incomplete information.
We successfully represented a hotel chain in a dispute concerning a supplier of fine china in a claim for breach of the Sale of Goods Act. The case concerned the effect of the supplier changing the descriptive mark on the porcelain china. The court concluded that the descriptive mark formed part of the description of the china and that by changing that mark without advising the hotel chain the supplier had breached the Sale of Goods Act and was thereby liable for damages.
We represented a homeowner being sued by an individual alleging that there was an oral agreement for sale of the subject property. We successfully defended the case both in the Supreme Court of British Columbia and on appeal.